Security Boulevard

via the comic artistry and dry wit of Randall Munroe, creator of XKCD

Permalink

The post Randall Munroe’s XKCD ‘Conic Sections’ appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Jan 30, 2026 - Alan Fagan - Quick Facts: AI Compliance ToolsManual tracking often falls short: Spreadsheets cannot track the millions of API calls and prompts generated by modern AI systems.Real-time is required: The best AI compliance tools monitor live traffic, not just static policy documents.Framework mapping matters: Firetail automatically maps activity to the OWASP LLM Top 10, NIST AI RMF.Context is king: Generic security tools miss the context of AI interactions; dedicated tools understand prompts, responses, and model behavior.FireTail automates the process: FireTail bridges the gap between written policy and technical reality by enforcing compliance rules at the model level.If you are still managing your AI compliance with a spreadsheet in 2026, you are already behind.A year or two ago, you might have gotten away with a manual "AI inventory" sent around to department heads. But as technical threats like prompt injection and data exfiltration become the primary focus for security auditors, the era of "check-the-box" compliance is over. Today, AI compliance isn’t about promising you have control; it’s about proving technical defense in real-time.The market is flooded with platforms promising to solve this, but many are just document repositories in disguise. They store your written policies but have zero visibility into your actual AI traffic. To protect the organization and satisfy the requirements of a modern technical audit, you need AI compliance tools that monitor what is actually happening at the API layer.This guide outlines exactly what security and compliance leaders need to look for when evaluating these solutions to ensure they can scale securely while meeting frameworks like the OWASP Top 10 and MITRE ATLAS.Why Are Dedicated AI Compliance Tools Necessary?You might be asking, "Can’t our existing GRC (Governance, Risk, and Compliance) platform handle this?"Usually, the answer is no.Traditional GRC tools are designed for static assets. They track servers, laptops, employee IDs, and software licenses. They are excellent at verifying that a laptop has antivirus installed or that a server is patched.AI is different. It is dynamic.A model that was compliant yesterday might drift today. A prompt sent by an employee might violate GDPR safeguards in seconds by including a customer's credit card number. Standard GRC tools do not see the context of these interactions. They don’t see the prompts, the responses, or the retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) data flows.Dedicated AI compliance tools are built to handle three specific challenges that legacy tools miss:The speed of AI adoption: Shadow AI apps pop up faster than IT can approve them.The complexity of models: LLMs behave non-deterministically, meaning the same input can sometimes result in different (and potentially risky) outputs.Regulatory fragmentation: Different regions (EU, US, Asia) have different rules for the same underlying tech, requiring automated "translation" of risk controls.Mapping AI Activity to the OWASP LLM Top 10The OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications has become the gold standard for technical AI compliance. If your compliance tool isn't automatically auditing against these vulnerabilities, you have a massive blind spot.When evaluating AI compliance tools, ensure they provide specific visibility into these core risks identified by the OWASP expert team:LLM01: Prompt InjectionThis is the most common vulnerability, occurring when crafted inputs manipulate the LLM’s behavior. Direct injections come from the user, while Indirect injections occur when the LLM processes external content (like a malicious webpage or document). These attacks can bypass safety filters, steal data, or force the model to perform unauthorized actions.LLM02: Sensitive Information DisclosureLLMs can inadvertently reveal confidential data, such as PII, financial details, or proprietary business logic, through their outputs. This risk is highest when sensitive data is used in the model's training set or when the application doesn't have sufficient filters to catch sensitive data before it reaches the end user.LLM03: Supply ChainThe LLM "supply chain" includes third-party pre-trained models, datasets, and software plugins. Vulnerabilities can arise from poisoned datasets on public hubs, outdated Python libraries, or compromised "LoRA" adapters. Organizations must vet every component of their AI stack just as they would traditional software.LLM04: Data and Model PoisoningThis involves the manipulation of training data or embedding data to introduce backdoors, biases, or vulnerabilities. By "poisoning" the data the model learns from, an attacker can create a "sleeper agent" model that behaves normally until triggered by a specific prompt to execute a malicious command.LLM05: Improper Output HandlingThis vulnerability occurs when an application blindly accepts LLM output without proper validation or sanitization. Because LLM output can be influenced by prompt injection, failing to treat it as untrusted content can lead to serious downstream attacks like Cross-Site Scripting (XSS), CSRF, or Remote Code Execution (RCE) on backend systems.LLM06: Excessive AgencyAs we move toward "AI Agents," this risk has become critical. It occurs when an LLM is granted too much functionality, too many permissions, or too much autonomy to call external tools and plugins. Without "human-in-the-loop" oversight, a model hallucination or a malicious prompt could trigger irreversible actions in your database or email systems.LLM07: System Prompt LeakageSystem prompts are the hidden instructions used to guide a model's behavior. If an attacker can force the LLM to reveal these instructions, they can uncover sensitive business logic, security guardrails, or even secrets like API keys that were incorrectly placed in the prompt language.LLM08: Vector and Embedding WeaknessesThis new category for 2025 focuses on Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG). Weaknesses in how vectors are generated, stored, or retrieved can allow attackers to inject harmful content into the "knowledge base" or perform "inversion attacks" to recover sensitive source information from the vector database.LLM09: MisinformationMisinformation (including "hallucinations") occurs when an LLM produces false or misleading information that appears highly credible. If users or applications place excessive trust in this unverified content, it can lead to reputational damage, legal liability, and dangerous errors in critical decision-making processes.LLM10: Unbounded ConsumptionLarge Language Models are resource-intensive. This category covers "Denial of Service" as well as "Denial of Wallet" (DoW) attacks, where an attacker triggers excessive inferences to skyrocket cloud costs. It also includes "Model Extraction," where attackers query the API repeatedly to steal the model’s intellectual property by training a "shadow model" on its outputs.Operationalizing Risk Management with MITRE ATLASWhile OWASP focuses on vulnerabilities, MITRE ATLAS (Adversarial Threat Landscape for Artificial-Intelligence Systems) focuses on the "how" of an attack. It provides a roadmap of adversary tactics.Effective AI risk management in 2026 requires mapping your AI logs directly to MITRE ATLAS tactics. This allows your security team to see the "big picture" of a breach. For example:Reconnaissance: Is an unknown entity probing your API to understand the model's logic?Model Evasion: Is someone trying to trick the AI into providing restricted information?Exfiltration: Is data being moved out of your secure environment via an AI interaction?When your compliance tool uses MITRE ATLAS, it speaks the same language as your Security Operations Center (SOC).How Do AI Compliance Tools Automate Framework Mapping?Nobody wants to manually map every API call to a specific paragraph in the NIST AI RMF or the EU AI Act. It is a full-time job that never ends.Look for tools that do this automatically. When a user queries an LLM, the system should instantly log that activity against your active frameworks. If a specific behavior violates a control like sending PII to a public model the tool should flag it as a compliance violation immediately.This automation is critical for passing audits. Instead of scrambling to find evidence, you simply export a report showing how every interaction mapped to the required standard.How Should AI Compliance Tools Integrate with Security Stacks?Do not buy a tool that creates a data silo.Your AI compliance solution should talk to your existing infrastructure. It needs to feed logs into your SIEM (like Splunk or Datadog), verify users through your Identity Provider (like Okta or Azure AD), and fit into your current workflows.If the tool requires a completely separate login and dashboard that nobody checks, it will fail. Security teams do not need more screens; they need better data on the screens they already use.Why Real-Time API Visibility is the Foundation of ComplianceYou cannot comply with what you cannot see. Because almost all AI usage flows through APIs, AI compliance tools must function as API security layers.Any tool that relies on employees voluntarily reporting their AI usage will fail. You need a solution that sits in the flow of traffic to detect:Who is using AI? (Identity-based tracking)Which models are being queried? (Identifying unauthorized "Shadow AI")What data is being sent? (Payload inspection)If your tool doesn't offer network-level or API-level visibility, it’s just a guessing game. You need to know if a developer is sending proprietary code to a public LLM the moment it happens, not weeks later during a manual audit.How Does FireTail Solve the Compliance Puzzle?At FireTail, we believe compliance shouldn't be a separate "administrative" task. It should be baked into the security operations you run every day.FireTail isn't just a dashboard; it’s an active layer of visibility and control.We Map to Reality: We don't just ask what you think is running. We show you the actual API calls and model usage, mapped directly to frameworks like OWASP LLM Top 10 and MITRE Atlas.We Catch the Drift: If a model’s behavior changes or a user starts sending sensitive data, we catch it in real-time, not during a quarterly review.We Automate the Evidence: FireTail creates the logs and traces you need to hand to an auditor, proving that your controls are working.In 2026, compliance is about being able to move fast without breaking things. The right tools give you the brakes and the steering you need to drive AI adoption safely.Ready to automate your AI compliance? See how FireTail maps your real-time usage to the frameworks that matter. Get a demo today.FAQs: AI Compliance ToolsWhat are AI compliance tools?AI compliance tools monitor and document how AI systems are used to meet regulatory and internal requirements, and FireTail does this by mapping real-time AI activity to compliance frameworks.Why do I need a specific tool for AI compliance? Traditional GRC tools cannot see AI prompts and responses in real time, while FireTail provides the visibility needed to audit AI behavior as it happens.How does MITRE ATLAS help with automated AI governance?MITRE ATLAS helps organizations understand attacker tactics. By mapping AI activity to this framework, FireTail allow security teams to treat AI governance as a part of their standard security operations.Can AI compliance tools detect Shadow AI? Effective AI compliance tools detect unauthorized AI usage. FireTail identifies unapproved AI applications across your environment.How does automation help with AI compliance? Automation reduces manual tracking by mapping AI activity to compliance requirements in real time, which FireTail handles automatically.What is prompt injection in AI security?Prompt injection is an attack where someone tricks an LLM into ignoring its original instructions to perform unauthorized actions. FireTail helps detect these "poisoned" prompts in real-time to prevent data breaches.

The post AI Compliance Tools: What to Look For – FireTail Blog appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Discover the best B2B healthcare SaaS SSO solutions for 2026. Compare SAML, OIDC, pricing, and features for secure hospital logins.

The post Top 10 B2B Healthcare SaaS SSO Solutions in 2026 appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Quality assurance teams across modern software development face a new reality. AI enabled applications do not behave like traditional systems. Outputs shift based on context....Read More

The post Agentic AI for Test Workflows. Why Our QA Team Built It and How Testing Changed as a Result appeared first on ISHIR | Custom AI Software Development Dallas Fort-Worth Texas.

The post Agentic AI for Test Workflows. Why Our QA Team Built It and How Testing Changed as a Result appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Passwordless authentication reduces risk and friction in online learning. See how passwordless login protects accounts, boosts access, and supports student services.

The post Why Passwordless Authentication Is Critical for Online Learning & Student Services appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Learn how to debug and fix invalid security token errors in Enterprise SSO, SAML, and CIAM systems. Practical tips for CTOs and VPs of Engineering.

The post How to Resolve Invalid Security Token Issues appeared first on Security Boulevard.

A deep dive into the evolution of identity management and cardspace technology. Learn how modern enterprise sso and ciam solutions replace legacy frameworks.

The post Exploring Identity Management and CardSpace Technology appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Explore the security of passkey synchronization. Learn how end-to-end encryption and cloud providers keep passwordless authentication secure across devices.

The post Are Passkeys Safely Synced Across Multiple Devices? appeared first on Security Boulevard.

With organizations becoming more digitally interconnected, threat actors are placing greater emphasis on manipulating people instead of breaching systems directly. One of the most deceptive and damaging tactics is helpdesk impersonation — a form of social engineering in which attackers pose as legitimate users or trusted personnel to manipulate support staff into granting unauthorized access. […]

The post Helpdesk Impersonation: A High-Risk Social Engineering Attack first appeared on StrongBox IT.

The post Helpdesk Impersonation: A High-Risk Social Engineering Attack appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Key Takeaways When companies run payment systems, those systems operate on infrastructure provided by hosting platforms. That layer includes the servers, networks, and data centers where applications live.  The term PCI compliance hosting is commonly used to describe infrastructure environments that have been structured with PCI-related security expectations in mind and that provide documentation and […]

The post Top 5 PCI Compliant Hosting Providers appeared first on Centraleyes.

The post Top 5 PCI Compliant Hosting Providers appeared first on Security Boulevard.

After two years of daily ChatGPT use, I recently started experimenting with Claude, Anthropic’s competing AI assistant.

Related: Microsofts see a  ‘protopian’ AI future

Claude is four to five times slower generating responses. But something emerged that matters more than … (more…)

The post MY TAKE: Transparent vs. opaque — edit Claude’s personalized memory, or trust ChatGPT’s blindly? first appeared on The Last Watchdog.

The post MY TAKE: Transparent vs. opaque — edit Claude’s personalized memory, or trust ChatGPT’s blindly? appeared first on Security Boulevard.

In cybersecurity, we live by our metrics. We measure Mean Time to Respond (MTTR), Dwell Time, and Patch Cadence. These numbers indicate to the Board how quickly we respond when issues arise.

But in the era of Agentic AI, reaction speed is no longer enough. When an AI Agent or an MCP server is compromised, data exfiltration happens in milliseconds rather than days. If you are waiting for an incident to measure your success, you have already lost.

CISOs need a new way to measure readiness, not just reaction. We call this strategic approach Agentic AI Posture.

Why Traditional Metrics Fail AI

Traditional security metrics are often binary. They ask whether the WAF is enabled and whether the endpoint agent is installed. Agentic AI defies this binary measurement because it is inherently dynamic. An MCP server might be secure today but insecure tomorrow because a developer exposed a new API endpoint that allows unrestricted data access. Similarly, an AI Agent might be compliant in testing but risky in production when it starts interacting with sensitive business logic in unexpected ways.

You cannot secure the AI Action Layer with a static checklist. You need a continuous view of risk that aggregates multiple signals from your API fabric.

The Three Pillars of AI Readiness

While no single dashboard dial can capture the complexity of AI, a robust understanding of your posture requires aggregating risk across three critical dimensions. CISOs should build their internal reporting around these pillars:

1. The Visibility Ratio

The first dimension asks if you can see the shadow agents. The Visibility Ratio compares the AI-driven API traffic you have inventoried against the unknown shadow traffic moving through your network. This is critical because if developers run MCP servers on localhost or connect CoPilots to production APIs without oversight, your visibility into those environments declines. You cannot govern what you cannot see, so the goal must always be complete visibility into the APIs your agents consume.

2. Privilege Density

The second dimension analyzes the actual power granted to your AI agents through the APIs they consume. This is not just about identity permissions; it is about the APIs' functional capabilities. You must ask whether the APIs your agents use support destructive actions, such as DELETE, or massive data retrieval, such as EXPORT_ALL, even if the agent only needs to read a single record. When AI agents are connected to APIs that are functionally over-permissive, the blast radius of a prompt injection attack expands exponentially. High privilege density indicates that your API endpoints expose too much business logic to autonomous decision-making.

3. Behavioral Integrity

The final dimension determines if your agents are behaving as expected. Behavioral Integrity tracks the frequency of anomalies detected in your API traffic. For example, is an agent that typically retrieves 5 records per minute suddenly requesting 5,000? A low integrity standing indicates that your agents are drifting from their intended logic or are under active manipulation. You need a stable baseline where deviations trigger immediate governance actions.

Talking to the Board: From Incidents to Risk Factors

Adopting an Agentic AI Posture mindset changes the conversation with your Board of Directors. Instead of simply reporting on attacks that have been stopped, you can discuss the Risk Factor of your API estate.

You can explain that while you have full visibility into your MCP servers, you are actively working to reduce the risk associated with APIs that expose sensitive financial data to external agents. This is the language of risk maturity. It shows the Board that you are proactively managing the attack surface rather than just reacting to incidents.

How Salt Security Enables This View

At Salt, we turn API visibility into a dedicated visual map of your AI Agent and MCP estate. Because we observe the API traffic powering these agents, we can automatically discover and catalog every machine identity operating in your environment, including the "shadow" agents deployed locally.

We then translate this data into actionable intelligence by calculating a risk score for each agent based on the APIs it consumes. If an MCP server has access to sensitive PII endpoints or uses overly permissive API methods, Salt flags it as a high-risk asset. This allows you to move beyond generic API security and assess your digital workforce posture, knowing exactly which agents are secure and which are introducing critical vulnerabilities.

Conclusion

As AI Agents become the primary consumers of your APIs, your security strategy must evolve from perimeter defense to posture governance. Understanding your risk across visibility, API privilege, and behavior is the only way to navigate this shift safely.

Don't wait for a breach to measure your resilience. Start assessing your API risk factors today.

If you want to learn more about Salt and how we can help you, please contact us, schedule a demo, or visit our website. You can also get a free API Attack Surface Assessment from Salt Security's research team and learn what attackers already know.

The post Measuring Agentic AI Posture: A New Metric for CISOs appeared first on Security Boulevard.

What is Agentic AI, and How Is It Changing the Landscape of Technology? Where technology evolves at warp speed, how do organizations ensure they stay ahead of the curve? One approach gaining traction is leveraging Agentic AI to drive innovation across various sectors. Agentic AI, a term often associated with autonomous decision-making systems, is paving […]

The post How does Agentic AI foster innovation in tech appeared first on Entro.

The post How does Agentic AI foster innovation in tech appeared first on Security Boulevard.

How Are Non-Human Identities Paving the Way for Secure Tech Environments? The digital transformation of industries has raised numerous questions about safeguarding sensitive information. How do organizations effectively manage machine identities to create secure environments? Enter the concept of Non-Human Identities (NHIs), a linchpin in fortifying tech security, especially when businesses transition to cloud-based systems. […]

The post What role does NHI play in secure tech environments appeared first on Entro.

The post What role does NHI play in secure tech environments appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Why Are Non-Human Identities Essential for Cloud Compliance? Can organizations truly trust their cloud compliance processes without effectively managing Non-Human Identities (NHIs)? With digital grows, the management of machine identities within cybersecurity becomes increasingly vital. NHIs, or machine identities, consist of secrets such as encrypted passwords, tokens, and keys. Together with permissions granted by destination […]

The post Why trust your cloud compliance to Agentic AI appeared first on Entro.

The post Why trust your cloud compliance to Agentic AI appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Are You Managing Non-Human Identities Effectively? The strategic management of Non-Human Identities (NHIs) is more important than ever for organizations expanding their cloud-based operations. NHIs, which consist of encrypted passwords, tokens, or keys combined with permissions, play a crucial role in securing machine identities. However, the inadequacies in managing them can create significant security vulnerabilities. […]

The post Why is scalable AI security important for growth appeared first on Entro.

The post Why is scalable AI security important for growth appeared first on Security Boulevard.

ReversingLabs this week published a report that finds there was a 73% increase in the number of malicious open source packages discovered in 2025 compared with the previous year. More than 10,000 malicious open source packages were discovered, most of which involved node package managers (npms) that cybercriminals were using to compromise software supply chains...

The post Report: Open Source Malware Instances Increased 73% in 2025 appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Reducing technical debt manually can be a time-consuming, never-ending process. Use tools to automate the process.

The post Still Trying to Reduce Technical Debt Manually? appeared first on Azul | Better Java Performance, Superior Java Support.

The post Still Trying to Reduce Technical Debt Manually? appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Season 5, EP 01: Unpacking RTO fallout, endpoint sprawl, tooling fatigue, junior workforce erosion

The post The Security Debt We Pretend Isn’t There appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Early 2026, Moltbot a new AI personal assistant went viral. GitGuardian detected 200+ leaked secrets related to it, including from healthcare and fintech companies. Our contribution to Moltbot: a skill that turns secret scanning into a conversational prompt, letting users ask "is this safe?"

The post Moltbot Personal Assistant Goes Viral—And So Do Your Secrets appeared first on Security Boulevard.