Aggregator

欢迎开通链必追账号体验

Google plans to make it easier for users to access AI mode by allowing them to set it as the default, replacing the traditional blue links. [...]

捷克网络安全机构警告中国技术对关键基础设施的风险，包括设备数据传输和远程控制能力。涉及领域包括能源、医疗、交通和政府。中国网络间谍组织APT31被指攻击捷克及北约盟国。

Czech cybersecurity agency NUKIB warns of Chinese cyber threats to critical infrastructure, citing the cyberespionage group APT31 and risky devices. The Czech Republic’s National Cyber and Information Security Agency (NUKIB) warns of growing risks from Chinese-linked technologies in critical sectors like energy, healthcare, transport, and government. The agency warns of risks from Chinese-made devices (phones, […]

为矿山企业数字化转型提供一站式私有云解决方案。

ChatGPT's Projects feature is now feature and second new feature allows you to create new conversations from existing conversations. [...]

基于 Dify 的 Agent 模式，实现了对告警上下文的分析，但深度依然有限

左与右其实是相对的，都是指在软件开发生命周期上开展的安全活动，一般来说会把上线作为左右的分界点。 左移固然好，因为在需求、设计阶段或编码时发现漏洞的修复成本，会远低于产品发布到线上带来的修复代价。随着云原生的普及，右移逐渐超过了上线出安全事故时做应急响应、上线后做渗透测试，还包括了线上运行时做安全防护、入侵检测等。 从业务系统的全生命周期来看，安全需要左移、也需要纵深防御，所以应该是无处不移，开发安全需要开发态下的安全保障，也需要运行态时的安全防护，具体的实践应该以现有安全状态为基础、结合实际情况而定。 ------------更多内容，请访问------------- 1、SDL 100问 SDL100问：我与SDL的故事 SAST误报太高，如何解决？ SDL需要哪些人参与？ 大家都有哪些SDL运营指标？ 业务系统是否可以带漏洞上线？ 日常的漏洞运营，也应该是SDL团队来做吗？ 关于开发安全BP，对开展SDL有哪些帮助？ SDL 87/100问：哪个厂商做SDL咨询服务和建设比较强？ SDL 88/100问：源代码扫描，是做仓库的全量扫描还是增量扫？ SDL 89/100问：如何推动业务方修复开源组件漏洞？ 2、SDL创新实践 首发！“ 研发安全运营 ” 架构研究与实践 DevSecOps实施关键：研发安全团队 DevSecOps实施关键：研发安全流程 DevSecOps实施关键：研发安全规范 DevSecOps实施关键：研发安全工具 从安全视角，看研发安全 数字化转型下研发安全痛点 一个思考：安全测试驱动产品安全？ 3、SDL最初实践 【SDL最初实践】开篇 【SDL最初实践】安全培训 【SDL最初实践】安全需求 【SDL最初实践】安全设计 【SDL最初实践】安全开发 【SDL最初实践】安全测试 【SDL最初实践】安全审核 【SDL最初实践】安全响应 4、安全运营实践 基于实践的安全事件简述 安全事件运营SOP：钓鱼邮件 安全事件运营SOP：网络攻击 安全事件运营SOP：蜜罐告警 安全事件运营SOP：webshell事件 安全事件运营SOP：接收漏洞事件 应急能力提升：实战应急困境与突破 应急能力提升：挖矿权限维持攻击模拟

Salesloft Drift breach traced to GitHub compromise and stolen OAuth tokens, Mandiant confirms breach contained and Salesforce data targeted.

Currently trending CVE - Hype Score: 1 - The issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Sequoia 15.4. An app may be able to access protected user data.

Why Proactive NHI Management is Crucial? Is your organization ready to face the ruthlessness of cyber threats? While businesses continue to adopt cloud computing, it is becoming vital to manage and secure Non-Human Identities (NHIs) to avoid data breaches. NHIs are machine-created identities essential in maintaining cybersecurity. Essentially, it is the combination of a Secret […]

The post Proactively Manage NHIs to Avoid Data Breaches appeared first on Entro.

The post Proactively Manage NHIs to Avoid Data Breaches appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Is Your Organization Managing its Non-Human Identities Effectively? Effective secrets and Non-Human Identities (NHIs) management is critical. These entities form the foundation of your organization’s security infrastructure, playing a crucial role in protecting your sensitive data, ensuring compliance, and mitigating potential threats. But what exactly are NHIs, and why are they so essential? NHIs are […]

The post Keep Your Data Safe with Proper Secrets Management appeared first on Entro.

The post Keep Your Data Safe with Proper Secrets Management appeared first on Security Boulevard.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Linux Kernel up to 6.12.42/6.15.10/6.16.1. This impacts the function dir_e_read of the component gfs2. Such manipulation leads to privilege escalation. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2025-38710. The attack can only be initiated within the local network. No exploit exists. You should upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in libavformat 57.34.103. This issue affects the function avcodec_decode_audio4 of the component libavcodec. This manipulation as part of MP3 File causes out-of-bounds read. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2016-5115. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability was found in podman. It has been declared as problematic. Affected is an unknown function of the component kube play Command Handler. Such manipulation leads to path traversal. This vulnerability is documented as CVE-2025-9566. The attack requires being on the local network. There is not any exploit available.

A vulnerability labeled as problematic has been found in Cilium up to 1.15.14/1.16.7/1.17.1. This impacts an unknown function. The manipulation results in incorrect authorization. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2025-30162. Attacking locally is a requirement. No exploit is available. The affected component should be upgraded.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in ash up to 3.5.38. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality in the library lib/ash/actions/create/bulk.ex. Performing manipulation results in incorrect authorization. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2025-48042. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. No exploit exists. It is advisable to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability described as problematic has been identified in Google Android 13/14/15/16. This affects the function setDisplayName of the file AssociationRequest.java. The manipulation results in protection mechanism failure. This vulnerability was named CVE-2025-48522. The attack needs to be approached locally. There is no available exploit. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

A vulnerability identified as critical has been detected in Imagination Graphics DDK up to 24.2 RTM2. This issue affects some unknown processing. Performing manipulation results in use after free. This vulnerability is reported as CVE-2025-46710. The attack requires a local approach. No exploit exists. You should upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Imagination Graphics DDK up to 1.15 RTM/1.17 RTM/1.18 RTM/24.1 RTM/24.2 RTM0. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component GPU System Call Handler. The manipulation results in improper handling of insufficient permissions or privileges. This vulnerability is cataloged as CVE-2025-46708. The attack must originate from the local network. There is no exploit available. You should upgrade the affected component.