Aggregator

A vulnerability has been found in Pivotal Spring-flex and classified as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component AMF3 Deserializer. The manipulation as part of Serialized Java Object leads to deserialization. This vulnerability was named CVE-2017-3203. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue.

A vulnerability was found in Microsoft Exchange 2013 SP1 and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2017-0110. The attack may be launched remotely. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue.

A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in GraniteDS 3.1.1.GA. Affected is an unknown function of the component AMF3 Deserializer. The manipulation as part of Serialized Java Object leads to deserialization. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2017-3199. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability was found in Exadel Flamingo amf-serializer 2.2.0. It has been declared as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component AMF3 Deserializer. The manipulation as part of AMF3 Message leads to xml external entity reference. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2017-3208. The attack can be launched remotely. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability was found in marp-team marp-core up to 3.9.0/4.0.0. It has been declared as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. This vulnerability was named CVE-2024-56510. The attack can be initiated remotely. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability was found in TOTOLINK A3002R 4.0.0-B20230531.1404. It has been classified as critical. This affects the function formWsc of the file /bin/boa. The manipulation leads to code injection. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2024-54907. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability was found in pluginsGLPI fields up to 1.21.12 and classified as critical. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to sql injection. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2024-45600. The attack may be launched remotely. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability has been found in pluginsGLPI addressing 3.0.0/3.0.1/3.0.2 and classified as critical. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component IP Report Handler. The manipulation leads to use of externally-controlled input to select classes or code. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2024-53850. The attack can be launched remotely. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in OpenCTI up to 6.2.x. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to information disclosure. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2024-45805. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in tltneon lgsl up to 6.x. This issue affects the function lgsl_query_40 of the file lgsl_protocol.php. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2024-56361. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability classified as critical was found in Eugeny tabby up to 1.0.215. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the component Environment Variable Handler. The manipulation of the argument DYLD_INSERT_LIBRARIES leads to incorrect default permissions. This vulnerability was named CVE-2024-55950. The attack needs to be approached locally. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, was found in Exadel Flamingo amf-serializer 2.2.0. This affects an unknown part of the component AMF3 Deserializer. The manipulation as part of Serialized Java Object leads to deserialization. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2017-3202. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability was found in Exadel Flamingo amf-serializer 2.2.0 and classified as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component AMF3 Deserializer. The manipulation as part of AMF3 Message leads to xml external entity reference. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2017-3206. The attack may be initiated remotely. There is no exploit available.

A vulnerability was found in Midnight Coders WebORB for Java 5.1.1.0. It has been classified as critical. Affected is an unknown function of the component AMF3 Deserializer. The manipulation as part of Serialized Java Object leads to deserialization. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2017-3207. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. There is no exploit available.

这个问题容易与另一个混淆：github信息泄露监测，从权责角度来看，这是安全人员的管理职责。然而标题所述，应该把安全人员定位为参与者比较合适。 对外开源项目可能是为了提升团队/个人影响力、遵循开源社区协议...等各种原因，综合来看算是一个合理的需求，但是需要注意数据资产安全性，比如：是否是核心代码，是否报备公司并取得同意，代码中是否含有公司相关的敏感信息？ 针对前两个问题，公司应该设置配置管理团队或技术委员会，对公司代码进行管理和使用审批，安全作为其中一环对要开源的项目进行敏感信息检测，各层检测/审批通过后方可对外开源。 更多软件安全内容，可以访问： 1、SDL100问：我与SDL的故事 SAST误报太高，如何解决？ SDL需要哪些人参与？ 设计阶段应开展哪些安全活动？ 有哪些不错的安全设计参考资料？ 安全设计要求怎么做才能落地？ 有哪些威胁建模方法论？ 如何选择开源组件安全扫描(SCA)工具？ SCA工具扫描出很多漏洞，如何处理？ SCA工具识别出高风险协议，如何处理？ 应该如何选型代码安全扫描工具？ 白盒检测工具存在局限性，如何进行补偿？ SCA用什么系统做，自研还是外购？ 有没有好用的SDL平台？ Sonar是否好用以及误报率咋样？ 如何推进有问题的jar包更新？ SCA工具的误报率怎样？ 在研发安全流程落地方面，有何经验？ 如何说服业务完成checklist自检？ sdl会对项目变更代码做review吗？ 如何展示SDL的成果或效果？ 怎么解决源代码两张皮导致安全失效？ 开发安全培训是否有效？ SDL 43/100问：安全组件如何在SDL中落地？ 2、SDL创新实践系列 首发！“ 研发安全运营 ” 架构研究与实践 DevSecOps实施关键：研发安全团队 DevSecOps实施关键：研发安全流程 DevSecOps实施关键：研发安全规范 从安全视角，看研发安全 数字化转型下的研发安全痛点

这个问题容易与另一个混淆：github信息泄露监测，从权责角度来看，这是安全人员的管理职责。然而标题所述，应该把安全人员定位为参与者比较合适。 对外开源项目可能是为了提升团队/个人影响力、遵循开源社区协议...等各种原因，综合来看算是一个合理的需求，但是需要注意数据资产安全性，比如：是否是核心代码，是否报备公司并取得同意，代码中是否含有公司相关的敏感信息？ 针对前两个问题，公司应该设置配置管理团队或技术委员会，对公司代码进行管理和使用审批，安全作为其中一环对要开源的项目进行敏感信息检测，各层检测/审批通过后方可对外开源。 更多软件安全内容，可以访问： 1、SDL100问：我与SDL的故事 SAST误报太高，如何解决？ SDL需要哪些人参与？ 设计阶段应开展哪些安全活动？ 有哪些不错的安全设计参考资料？ 安全设计要求怎么做才能落地？ 有哪些威胁建模方法论？ 如何选择开源组件安全扫描(SCA)工具？ SCA工具扫描出很多漏洞，如何处理？ SCA工具识别出高风险协议，如何处理？ 应该如何选型代码安全扫描工具？ 白盒检测工具存在局限性，如何进行补偿？ SCA用什么系统做，自研还是外购？ 有没有好用的SDL平台？ Sonar是否好用以及误报率咋样？ 如何推进有问题的jar包更新？ SCA工具的误报率怎样？ 在研发安全流程落地方面，有何经验？ 如何说服业务完成checklist自检？ sdl会对项目变更代码做review吗？ 如何展示SDL的成果或效果？ 怎么解决源代码两张皮导致安全失效？ 开发安全培训是否有效？ SDL 43/100问：安全组件如何在SDL中落地？ 2、SDL创新实践系列 首发！“ 研发安全运营 ” 架构研究与实践 DevSecOps实施关键：研发安全团队 DevSecOps实施关键：研发安全流程 DevSecOps实施关键：研发安全规范 从安全视角，看研发安全 数字化转型下的研发安全痛点

这个问题容易与另一个混淆：github信息泄露监测，从权责角度来看，这是安全人员的管理职责。然而标题所述，应该把安全人员定位为参与者比较合适。 对外开源项目可能是为了提升团队/个人影响力、遵循开源社区协议...等各种原因，综合来看算是一个合理的需求，但是需要注意数据资产安全性，比如：是否是核心代码，是否报备公司并取得同意，代码中是否含有公司相关的敏感信息？ 针对前两个问题，公司应该设置配置管理团队或技术委员会，对公司代码进行管理和使用审批，安全作为其中一环对要开源的项目进行敏感信息检测，各层检测/审批通过后方可对外开源。 更多软件安全内容，可以访问： 1、SDL100问：我与SDL的故事 SAST误报太高，如何解决？ SDL需要哪些人参与？ 设计阶段应开展哪些安全活动？ 有哪些不错的安全设计参考资料？ 安全设计要求怎么做才能落地？ 有哪些威胁建模方法论？ 如何选择开源组件安全扫描(SCA)工具？ SCA工具扫描出很多漏洞，如何处理？ SCA工具识别出高风险协议，如何处理？ 应该如何选型代码安全扫描工具？ 白盒检测工具存在局限性，如何进行补偿？ SCA用什么系统做，自研还是外购？ 有没有好用的SDL平台？ Sonar是否好用以及误报率咋样？ 如何推进有问题的jar包更新？ SCA工具的误报率怎样？ 在研发安全流程落地方面，有何经验？ 如何说服业务完成checklist自检？ sdl会对项目变更代码做review吗？ 如何展示SDL的成果或效果？ 怎么解决源代码两张皮导致安全失效？ 开发安全培训是否有效？ SDL 43/100问：安全组件如何在SDL中落地？ 2、SDL创新实践系列 首发！“ 研发安全运营 ” 架构研究与实践 DevSecOps实施关键：研发安全团队 DevSecOps实施关键：研发安全流程 DevSecOps实施关键：研发安全规范 从安全视角，看研发安全 数字化转型下的研发安全痛点

Why Do We Need a Paradigm Shift in Cloud Security? The surge in cybersecurity incidents globally has left experts asking: Is it time we change our approach to cloud security, considering that breaches are no longer a question of if, but when? The answer, according to data-driven insights, is a resounding yes. A paradigm shift […]

The post Revolutionizing Cloud Security for Future Threats appeared first on Entro.

The post Revolutionizing Cloud Security for Future Threats appeared first on Security Boulevard.

How Does Automated Secrets Handling Enhance Security? There’s a pressing puzzle to solve in today’s hyper-connected businesses. How do you ensure the safe management of non-human identities (NHIs) and their secrets in a cloud environment? NHIs are critical components in the cybersecurity landscape. They are machine identities established by combining a secret (a unique encrypted […]

The post Ensuring Safety with Automated Secrets Handling appeared first on Entro.

The post Ensuring Safety with Automated Secrets Handling appeared first on Security Boulevard.

Can Advanced Secret Management Accelerate Your Cybersecurity Confidence? As a seasoned data management expert and cybersecurity specialist, I can confirm that Non-Human Identities (NHIs) and Secrets Security Management provide a significant boost to modern cybersecurity strategies. With a rise in digital transformations, the role of NHIs has become pivotal. But how can we build confidence […]

The post Build Confidence with Advanced Secret Management appeared first on Entro.

The post Build Confidence with Advanced Secret Management appeared first on Security Boulevard.