Aggregator
CVE-2024-8687 | Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS/GlobalProtect App/Cloud NGFW/Prisma Access Configuration exposure of sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere
CVE-2024-8686 | Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS/Cloud NGFW/Prisma Access os command injection
CVE-2024-8691 | Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS/Cloud NGFW/Prisma Access GlobalProtect Portal authorization
Microsoft Fixes Four 0-Days — One Exploited for SIX YEARS
Week B: Bugs begone! This month Redmond fixes 79 security flaws in Windows and other products
The post Microsoft Fixes Four 0-Days — One Exploited for SIX YEARS appeared first on Security Boulevard.
CVE-2024-8688 | Palo Alto Networks PAN-OS/Cloud NGFW/Prisma Access prior 11.2.0 Command Line Interface wildcards or matching symbols
CVE-2024-20381 | Cisco IOS XR JSON-RPC API improper authorization (cisco-sa-nso-auth-bypass-QnTEesp)
CVE-2024-20489 | Cisco IOS XR 24.1.1/24.1.2/24.2.1/24.2.11/24.3.1 Configuration File credentials storage (cisco-sa-iosxr-ponctlr-ci-OHcHmsFL)
CVE-2024-20398 | Cisco IOS XR up to 24.1.1 CLI os command injection (cisco-sa-iosxr-priv-esc-CrG5vhCq)
CVE-2024-20343 | Cisco IOS XR up to 24.1.1 CLI access control (cisco-sa-iosxr-shellutil-HCb278wD)
CVE-2024-20406 | Cisco IOS XR up to 7.11.1 System-to-Intermediate System Protocol denial of service (cisco-sa-isis-xehpbVNe)
CVE-2024-20317 | Cisco IOS XR up to 7.10.1 Ethernet Frame incorrect provision of specified functionality (cisco-sa-l2services-2mvHdNuC)
CVE-2024-20390 | Cisco IOS XR up to 24.2.1 Dedicated XML Agent verification of source (cisco-sa-iosxr-xml-tcpdos-ZEXvrU2S)
CVE-2024-20483 | Cisco IOS XR 24.1.1/24.1.2/24.2.1/24.2.11/24.3.1 Routed PON Controller Software os command injection (cisco-sa-iosxr-ponctlr-ci-OHcHmsFL)
CVE-2024-20304 | Cisco IOS XR up to 24.2.11 UDP Packets memory leak (cisco-sa-pak-mem-exhst-3ke9FeFy)
CVE-2017-15217 | ImageMagick 7.0.7-2 coders/sgi.c ReadSGIImage resource consumption (USN-3681-1 / Nessus ID 105455)
CVE-2007-2556 | Nuked-klaN 1.7.6 nk sql injection (EDB-3858 / XFDB-34116)
Understand Blocked Requests Faster with Rule Tracing | Impart Security
Introducing Rule Tracing
We're excited to announce the release of Rule Tracing, a powerful new feature in Impart Security that provides clear visibility into which specific security rule triggered a blocking decision. This feature enables security engineers to design, test, and fine-tune a comprehensive security policy more efficiently than ever.
Security rules are rarely deployed in isolation. They work together as part of a broader strategy to defend against a wide range of threats. With Rule Tracing, you gain immediate insight into the rule responsible for any block, eliminating the need for cumbersome log analysis and manual investigation.
Key Benefits:
- Trace Blocking Behavior : Quickly identify the rule that triggered a block without sifting through detailed logs.
- Filter Blocked Requests: Enhance your security policies by understanding the impact of each rule within your broader threat mitigation strategy.
- Faster Rule Development: Pinpoint blocking rules in real time, streamlining both testing and troubleshooting.
Why This Matters
Legacy WAFs and out of band API security solutions cannot offer this level of transparency. In legacy systems, identifying the exact rule responsible for blocking an attack can be a slow, labor-intensive process, requiring deep log analysis, which is too little, too late.
Impart's Rule Tracing simplifies this, empowering security teams to respond faster and maintain more effective defenses.
Subscribe to newsletterWant to learn more about API security? Subscribe to our newsletter for updates.
Thank you! Your submission has been received! Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.The post Understand Blocked Requests Faster with Rule Tracing | Impart Security appeared first on Security Boulevard.