Aggregator
捷克技术大学 | 加密流量分类:QUIC协议场景下的分析
Splunk Universal Forwarder on Windows Lets Non-Admin Users Access All Contents
A high-severity vulnerability was uncovered in Splunk Universal Forwarder for Windows that compromises directory access controls. The flaw, designated CVE-2025-20298 with a CVSSv3.1 score of 8.0, affects multiple versions of the software and poses significant security risks to enterprise environments relying on Splunk’s data forwarding capabilities. The vulnerability stems from incorrect permission assignment during the […]
The post Splunk Universal Forwarder on Windows Lets Non-Admin Users Access All Contents appeared first on Cyber Security News.
CVE-2013-2492 | Firebird SQL Server up to 2.5.3 memory corruption (dsa-2647 / EDB-41709)
Microsoft снова режет по живому: ИИ в офис, люди — на улицу, спасибо за вклад
CVE-2018-5989 | ccNewsletter 2.x on Joomla Parameter sql injection (EDB-44132)
Delving Into the SparkRAT Remote Access Tool
CVE-2025-5116 | brikou WP Plugin Info Card up to 5.3.1 on WordPress cross site scripting (EUVD-2025-16712)
CVE-2025-31359 | Parallels Desktop 20.2.2 (55879) on macOS PVMP Package Unpacking path traversal (TALOS-2025-2160 / EUVD-2025-16718)
CVE-2024-54189 | Parallels Desktop 20.1.1 on macOS Snapshot unix hard link (TALOS-2024-2124 / EUVD-2024-54642)
CVE-2024-52561 | Parallels Desktop 20.1.1 on macOS Snapshot incorrect ownership assignment (TALOS-2024-2123 / EUVD-2024-54641)
CVE-2024-36486 | Parallels Desktop 20.1.1 on macOS Virtual Machine Archive Restoration prl_vmarchiver unix hard link (TALOS-2024-2126 / EUVD-2024-54643)
Honoring Innovation, Growth, and Collaboration: The Akamai Partner Awards
CISA Adds Three Known Exploited Vulnerabilities to Catalog
CISA has added three new vulnerabilities to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) Catalog, based on evidence of active exploitation.
- CVE-2025-21479 Qualcomm Multiple Chipsets Incorrect Authorization Vulnerability
- CVE-2025-21480 Qualcomm Multiple Chipsets Incorrect Authorization Vulnerability
- CVE-2025-27038 Qualcomm Multiple Chipsets Use-After-Free Vulnerability
These types of vulnerabilities are frequent attack vectors for malicious cyber actors and pose significant risks to the federal enterprise.
Binding Operational Directive (BOD) 22-01: Reducing the Significant Risk of Known Exploited Vulnerabilities established the KEV Catalog as a living list of known Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CVEs) that carry significant risk to the federal enterprise. BOD 22-01 requires Federal Civilian Executive Branch (FCEB) agencies to remediate identified vulnerabilities by the due date to protect FCEB networks against active threats. See the BOD 22-01 Fact Sheet for more information.
Although BOD 22-01 only applies to FCEB agencies, CISA strongly urges all organizations to reduce their exposure to cyberattacks by prioritizing timely remediation of KEV Catalog vulnerabilities as part of their vulnerability management practice. CISA will continue to add vulnerabilities to the catalog that meet the specified criteria.
CISA Releases Three Industrial Control Systems Advisories
CISA released three Industrial Control Systems (ICS) advisories on June 3, 2025. These advisories provide timely information about current security issues, vulnerabilities, and exploits surrounding ICS.
- ICSA-25-153-01 Schneider Electric Wiser Home Automation
- ICSA-25-153-02 Schneider Electric EcoStruxure Power Build Rapsody
- ICSA-25-153-03 Mitsubishi Electric MELSEC iQ-F Series
CISA encourages users and administrators to review newly released ICS advisories for technical details and mitigations.
New NIST Standard Helps Deliver the Right Dosage of Cancer-Fighting Drugs
Posture ≠ Protection
CSPM, DSPM, ASPM, SSPM, ESPM — the alphabet soup of Security Posture Management (SPM) tools promises visibility into risk. They map misconfigurations, surface exposure paths and highlight policy gaps. That can be useful. But let’s not confuse awareness with action.
They don’t block threats.They don’t enforce controls.
They don’t prevent breaches.
SPMs detect, then delegate. A ticket. A Slack alert. An integration call. Protection is someone else’s problem.
To compensate, many posture tools claim to orchestrate security. They integrate with enforcement tools like DLP, CWPP, EDR and WAF. But wiring systems together doesn’t make the system secure.
Coordination ≠ ProtectionVisibility ≠ Control
Monitoring ≠ Security So why is there an abundance of SPM vendors?
Because posture is easier.
- Easier to build. Cloud-only, read-only, event-driven. No need to support endpoints, on-prem, hybrid or inline enforcement. Just scan, analyze, alert.
- Easier to sell. No rip-and-replace. Posture tools bolt onto the existing stack, not replace it. That also means customers end up managing yet another vendor, another dashboard, another integration.
- Easier to adopt. No agents, low friction, fast time-to-value. Good enough to show progress, but not strong enough to stop attacks.
Yes, posture matters. But let’s not mistake issue tracking for actual security.
Security requires action — not just awareness.
False confidence, real consequencesThere’s an illusion of progress that posture tools can create. Dashboards look active. Tickets are assigned. Metrics suggest movement. But beneath that layer of perceived control, many organizations remain dangerously exposed.
In fact, {children}. Visibility alone isn’t moving the needle—security teams are still drowning in noise while real risks slip through. That's the difference between knowing something's wrong and doing something about it.
It’s why so many breaches still happen in environments that were “monitored.” The problem wasn’t a lack of alerts, it was the inability to respond in time.
And the results? Stolen IP. Leaked customer records. Compliance violations. Brand damage. Leadership churn.
The stakes aren’t theoretical. And yet too many teams are trapped in a cycle of detection without defense.
It’s time to rethink what protection meansThe right approach isn’t a patchwork of posture tools and point integrations. It’s a unified system — deep within a specific domain — that doesn’t just highlight problems but solves them in real time.
Whether you’re focused on data, identities or assets, true security means:
- Continuous classification of what’s sensitive: Modern DLP starts by building a living inventory of sensitive data — constantly discovering and labeling information across SaaS apps, endpoints, on-premise file shares and emails. It ensures you always know what you're protecting, even as your data changes and moves.
- Real-time monitoring of how it’s accessed and shared: Visibility into who’s touching your data, when, and how allows security teams to identify risky behavior instantly — not after the fact. This creates accountability and supports both proactive defense and forensic insight.
- Contextual enforcement that prevents misuse: It’s not enough to just watch. Real-time protection at the endpoint means applying intelligent controls based on business context — blocking or coaching users when behavior looks risky, not just flagging it.
- Automated remediation that closes the loop: When policies are violated, MIND acts. From revoking access and deleting shared links to educating users in near real time, the loop is closed automatically — without requiring tickets, escalations or delays.
This isn’t a wishlist. This is what modern DLP — done right — can and should deliver.
Enter MIND: Posture & PreventionThat’s what MIND was built to do.
MIND combines the context-aware insights of DSPM (posture) with the automated enforcement of modern DLP (prevention).
We help security teams move beyond alert fatigue to actual control. Beyond passive monitoring to meaningful action. Beyond fractured tools to full-spectrum protection.
Our AI-powered classification engine understands your data in context—whether it’s source code, contracts, financial records, credentials, passwords, or PII. And it enforces your policies wherever data lives: SaaS and Gen AI apps, endpoints, on-premise file shares, emails and beyond.
We don’t just surface issues. We solve them.We don’t just map risks. We mitigate them.
We don’t just warn you. We stop the leaks.
Security leaders are overburdened, not underinformed. With limited resources, increasing complexity and high expectations, they need solutions that deliver results, not just more dashboards.
Stop scanning. Start securing.
Mind What Matters.The post Posture ≠ Protection appeared first on Security Boulevard.
CVE-2005-4053 | coWiki 0.3.4 26.html cross site scripting (EDB-30515 / BID-25393)
Beware of Fake Booking.com Sites That Infects Your Devices With AsyncRAT
Cybercriminals have launched a sophisticated campaign targeting travelers through fake Booking.com websites that deploy AsyncRAT malware, according to recent security research. The threat actors redirect users from gaming sites, social media platforms, and sponsored advertisements to convincing replica booking sites designed to compromise visitor devices. This attack capitalizes on the fact that 40% of people […]
The post Beware of Fake Booking.com Sites That Infects Your Devices With AsyncRAT appeared first on Cyber Security News.