Aggregator

A vulnerability classified as very critical has been found in Fortinet FortiManager and FortiAnalyzer up to 6.2.11/6.4.12/7.0.8/7.2.3/7.4.0. This affects an unknown part of the component HTTP Request Handler. The manipulation leads to relative path traversal. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2023-42791. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability was found in Apple macOS. It has been declared as critical. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to improper access controls. This vulnerability was named CVE-2024-54527. An attack has to be approached locally. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability was found in Apple watchOS. It has been rated as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to improper access controls. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2024-54527. Local access is required to approach this attack. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Apple iOS and iPadOS. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to improper access controls. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2024-54527. Attacking locally is a requirement. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in Apple tvOS. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to improper access controls. This vulnerability is known as CVE-2024-54526. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Apple macOS. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality. The manipulation leads to improper access controls. This vulnerability is handled as CVE-2024-54526. The attack needs to be approached locally. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, was found in Apple watchOS. This affects an unknown part. The manipulation leads to improper access controls. This vulnerability is uniquely identified as CVE-2024-54526. An attack has to be approached locally. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability has been found in Apple iOS and iPadOS and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code. The manipulation leads to improper access controls. This vulnerability was named CVE-2024-54526. Local access is required to approach this attack. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability was found in Apple macOS up to 13.6/14.6/15.1 and classified as critical. This issue affects some unknown processing of the component File Handler. The manipulation leads to improper access controls. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2024-54528. Attacking locally is a requirement. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability was found in Apple watchOS and classified as problematic. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation leads to information disclosure. The identification of this vulnerability is CVE-2024-44290. The attack needs to be approached locally. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability was found in Apple iOS and iPadOS. It has been classified as problematic. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to information disclosure. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2024-44290. An attack has to be approached locally. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

A vulnerability classified as critical has been found in Apple macOS up to 13.6/14.6/15.1. Affected is an unknown function. The manipulation leads to improper access controls. This vulnerability is traded as CVE-2024-54474. An attack has to be approached locally. There is no exploit available. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component.

Arctic Wolf plans to integrate Cylance's endpoint detection and response (EDR) technology into its extended detection and response (XDR) platform.

A Threat Actor Claims to have Leaked Data of Sam.gov

The FBI warned today that new HiatusRAT malware attacks are now scanning for and infecting vulnerable web cameras and DVRs that are exposed online. [...]

The Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center and its El Paso counterpart suffered a cyberattack that disrupted computer systems and applications, potentially exposing the data of 1.4 million patients. [...]

常见的研发安全流程有：安全提测流程、漏洞修复流程、绿色通道上线流程等，这些流程的落地离不开现有研发流程及卡点。 1、先说研发流程，其实应该涉及产品的立项、需求评审、架构评审及上线前的审核等，安全的相关流程应该保持与研发流程一致； 2、再说安全卡点，一般设置在资源申请（内网应用系统如域名资源）、规则申请（外网应用系统如ACL映射），可以在这些关键节点上加上安全验收检查，以保证流程的落地应用。 安全流程的落地一定要尽可能轻量、柔和接入，还要保持处理效率。因此SDL做到最后，肯定是需要一个线上化的平台来处理流程在内的所有相关事情。 更多软件安全内容，可以访问： 1、SDL100问：我与SDL的故事 SAST误报太高，如何解决？ SDL需要哪些人参与？ 设计阶段应开展哪些安全活动？ 有哪些不错的安全设计参考资料？ 安全设计要求怎么做才能落地？ 有哪些威胁建模方法论？ 有哪些威胁建模工具？ 如何开始或实施威胁建模？ 威胁建模和架构安全评审，有何异同？ 编码阶段，开展哪些安全活动？ 如何选择静态代码扫描(SAST)工具？ 如何选择开源组件安全扫描(SCA)工具？ SCA工具扫描出很多漏洞，如何处理？ SCA工具识别出高风险协议，如何处理？ 如何制定一份有用的开发安全规范？ 如何做到开发安全规范的有效实施？ 应该如何选型代码安全扫描工具？ 代码安全扫描应该设置哪些指标？ 如何提升开发人员的安全意识？ 白盒检测工具存在局限性，如何进行补偿？ SCA用什么系统做，自研还是外购？ 有没有好用的SDL平台？ Sonar是否好用以及误报率咋样？ 如何推进有问题的jar包更新？ SDL 35/100问：SCA工具的误报率怎样？ 2、SDL创新实践系列 首发！“ 研发安全运营 ” 架构研究与实践 DevSecOps实施关键：研发安全团队 DevSecOps实施关键：研发安全流程 DevSecOps实施关键：研发安全规范 从安全视角，看研发安全 数字化转型下的研发安全痛点